for at udvide
kategorilisten.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This book provides a fresh perspective on resolving sovereign debt disputes within the investor-state mediation framework.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This book is written to transform land disputes toward win-win outcomes utilizing the latest sustainable development... Læs mere
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This book delves into the intricacies of encouraging African states' participation in a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC), set against the backdrop of their experiences with international investment agreements and the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) system.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This volume presents pioneering research for the purpose of developing a common analytical foundation and framework for the emerging interdisciplinary research field of investment control and national security.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
The book focuses on some of the most pressing issues in international investment law in Asia, such as the role of developing countries, the rebalancing between the investors’ rights protection and the host states’ right to regulate, the ISDS reform, among others.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This book is the first to systematically illustrate the application of the New York Convention in China in... Læs mere
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This timely book offers a comprehensive study of the emergency arbitrator mechanism that provides interim measures in international commercial arbitration before the constitution of an arbitral tribunal, focusing on the enforceability of the interim measures granted.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
Combining the author's many years of legal practice experience, this book examines the current hot and difficult issues arising in the legal practice of foreign-related commercial disputes in China.
Bemærk: Kan ikke leveres før jul.
This book aims to identify the sociological reasons that resulted in the perceived lack of authority of precedents in civil law systems, starting from the premise that common law systems rely on precedents, while civil law systems do not.